<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Albany Government Law Review Fireplace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/osd.xml" title="Albany Government Law Review Fireplace" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Compare Two of Our Posts!</title>
		<link>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/03/08/compare-two-of-our-posts/</link>
		<comments>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/03/08/compare-two-of-our-posts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marisa Floriani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/?p=762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out Melissa Dizon&#8217;s and Lela Gray&#8217;s articles on the Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.
       <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org&blog=4786202&post=762&subd=aglr&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/03/08/compare-two-of-our-posts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">mfloriani</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010’s First Landmark Supreme Court Decision: Balancing Potential Political Corruption and Free Speech</title>
		<link>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/03/08/2010%e2%80%99s-first-landmark-supreme-court-decision-balancing-potential-political-corruption-and-free-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/03/08/2010%e2%80%99s-first-landmark-supreme-court-decision-balancing-potential-political-corruption-and-free-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marisa Floriani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11 CFR 100.29a2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2 USC 434F3A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2 USC 441b]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens not united]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erwin chemerinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary: The Movie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/?p=760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Lela Gray, Government Law Review member
             The U.S. Supreme Court (Supreme Court) decision in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is causing fireworks throughout the nation weeks after New Years.  In a heavily split 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibits Congress from barring corporate and union general funds [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org&blog=4786202&post=760&subd=aglr&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/03/08/2010%e2%80%99s-first-landmark-supreme-court-decision-balancing-potential-political-corruption-and-free-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">mfloriani</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission:  Preservation of First Amendment Freedoms, or an Invitation to Corporations to Bankroll the United States Election Process?</title>
		<link>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/03/01/citizens-united-v-federal-election-commission-preservation-of-first-amendment-freedoms-or-an-invitation-to-corporations-to-bankroll-the-united-states-election-process/</link>
		<comments>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/03/01/citizens-united-v-federal-election-commission-preservation-of-first-amendment-freedoms-or-an-invitation-to-corporations-to-bankroll-the-united-states-election-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marisa Floriani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2 USC 441b]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Liptak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate funding elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hilary: The Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McConnell v. Federal Elections Comm'n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McGain-Feingold ACt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/?p=754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Melissa Ann Dizon, Government Law Review Member 
The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, recently held that corporate funding of political broadcasts in candidate elections cannot be limited because to do so would run afoul of the First Amendment.[1]  This ruling stemmed from the non-profit corporation Citizens United&#8217;s case before the court regarding its documentary [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org&blog=4786202&post=754&subd=aglr&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/03/01/citizens-united-v-federal-election-commission-preservation-of-first-amendment-freedoms-or-an-invitation-to-corporations-to-bankroll-the-united-states-election-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">mfloriani</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have any questions or concerns?</title>
		<link>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/02/26/have-any-questions-or-concerns/</link>
		<comments>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/02/26/have-any-questions-or-concerns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marisa Floriani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/?p=750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Email the Fireplace Blog at:    govlawreview@albanylaw.edu
       <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org&blog=4786202&post=750&subd=aglr&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/02/26/have-any-questions-or-concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">mfloriani</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>United States Court of Appeals Limits First Amendment Rights: Public School Teacher Cannot Pursue Retaliation Claim Against School</title>
		<link>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/02/22/united-states-court-of-appeals-limits-first-amendment-rights-public-school-teacher-cannot-pursue-retaliation-claim-against-school/</link>
		<comments>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/02/22/united-states-court-of-appeals-limits-first-amendment-rights-public-school-teacher-cannot-pursue-retaliation-claim-against-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marisa Floriani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board of Education of the City of New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David H. Weintraub]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garcetti v. Ceballos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[official duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pickering v. Board of Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public school teacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Gillers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Court of Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weintraub v. Board of Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/?p=747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lauren Palmer, Government Law Review member
          On January 27, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, held that another type of speech is not protected under the First Amendment.  Public employees’ speech made “pursuant to . . . official duties” is not a protected speech.[1]  The case, Weintraub v. Board of Education, involved a [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org&blog=4786202&post=747&subd=aglr&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/02/22/united-states-court-of-appeals-limits-first-amendment-rights-public-school-teacher-cannot-pursue-retaliation-claim-against-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">mfloriani</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York City Teachers: Leave Obama at the Schoolhouse Gate</title>
		<link>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/02/16/new-york-city-teachers-leave-obama-at-the-schoolhouse-gate/</link>
		<comments>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/02/16/new-york-city-teachers-leave-obama-at-the-schoolhouse-gate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marisa Floriani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 WL 254915]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[393 US 503]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[484 US 260]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chancellor joel klein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Moshman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Kaplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tinker v. Des Moin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united federation of teachers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/?p=742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brady Begeal, Albany Government Law Review Member
During the Presidential campaign race of 2008, the United Federation of Teachers (UFT), the largest public school teachers’ union in the country, began distributing pro-Obama political materials to its members after deciding that summer to support Obama’s run for office.[1]  Soon after, New York City informed UFT that teachers [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org&blog=4786202&post=742&subd=aglr&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/02/16/new-york-city-teachers-leave-obama-at-the-schoolhouse-gate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">mfloriani</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super Bowl Commercial Raises First Amendment Concerns</title>
		<link>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/02/07/super-bowl-commercial-raises-first-amendment-concerns/</link>
		<comments>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/02/07/super-bowl-commercial-raises-first-amendment-concerns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marisa Floriani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[395 US 44]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[553 us 285]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandenburg v. Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clear and present danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heisman Trophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super bowl 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super bowl commercials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tebow commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim tebow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States v. Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's media center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/?p=739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fatin Haddad, Government Law Review member
            According to FOX News, a commercial that is approved to air during the Super Bowl is stirring up quite a controversy.[1]  College football phenomenon, Tim Tebow, and his mother are scheduled to appear in a pro-life commercial during the Super Bowl.[2]  The commercial is being funded by a conservative, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org&blog=4786202&post=739&subd=aglr&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/02/07/super-bowl-commercial-raises-first-amendment-concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">mfloriani</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mature Minor Doctrine: Should a Mature Minor Have the Right to Refuse Life-Sustaining Treatment in New York?</title>
		<link>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/02/01/the-mature-minor-doctrine-should-a-mature-minor-have-the-right-to-refuse-life-sustaining-treatment-in-new-york/</link>
		<comments>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/02/01/the-mature-minor-doctrine-should-a-mature-minor-have-the-right-to-refuse-life-sustaining-treatment-in-new-york/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marisa Floriani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Do Not Resuscitate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fosmire v. Nicoleau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in re seiferth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life-sustaining treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matter of Storar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical decision making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule of Sevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/?p=731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Telfer, Government Law Review Member
Background
          In the area of medical decision making, minors “are presumed incompetent, and thus require the aid of parents or guardians to assist in the decision-making process.” [1]  Under common law, doctors were required “to obtain parental consent before treating a minor” and were liable for battery if a minor [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org&blog=4786202&post=731&subd=aglr&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/02/01/the-mature-minor-doctrine-should-a-mature-minor-have-the-right-to-refuse-life-sustaining-treatment-in-new-york/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">mfloriani</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>International Child Abduction and the Legitimacy of International Law</title>
		<link>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/01/19/international-child-abduction-and-the-legitimacy-of-international-law/</link>
		<comments>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/01/19/international-child-abduction-and-the-legitimacy-of-international-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marisa Floriani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battle over Child]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bring Sean Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruna Bianchi Carneiro Ribeiro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter of the United Nations']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Abduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Goldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drummond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edecio Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elian Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hague Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HCCH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Child Abduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Law Norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey L. Dunoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joano Paulo Lins e Silva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirk Semple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY Divorce and Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafael romo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Goldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Goldman Controversy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Padgett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/?p=721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alicia Dodge, Government Law Review Member 
I.  Background
      The vast advancements in technological capabilities have greatly changed traditional jurisdictional principles.  No longer is it sufficient for a state’s laws to only apply to persons and property solely within its territory, a concept known as the “territorial principle.”1  A state’s jurisdiction must now be able to extend extraterritorially in [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org&blog=4786202&post=721&subd=aglr&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2010/01/19/international-child-abduction-and-the-legitimacy-of-international-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">mfloriani</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU Sues School in Online Photo Controversy: Female Students Punished for Racy MySpace Pictures</title>
		<link>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2009/12/01/aclu-sues-school-in-online-photo-controversy-female-students-punished-for-racy-myspace-pictures/</link>
		<comments>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2009/12/01/aclu-sues-school-in-online-photo-controversy-female-students-punished-for-racy-myspace-pictures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marisa Floriani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Civil Liberties Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Churubusco High School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student online activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[substantial disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/?p=709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brittany Grome, Government Law Review Member
Background
           In Indianapolis, Indiana, two sophomore girls at Churubusco High School were punished by the school district for posting sexually suggestive photos on their MySpace pages.[1] According to the complaint, the girls dressed in lingerie and pretended to lick “penis-shaped” lollipops.[2] These photos were taking during their summer break at [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org&blog=4786202&post=709&subd=aglr&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://glrfireplace.albanygovernmentlawreview.org/2009/12/01/aclu-sues-school-in-online-photo-controversy-female-students-punished-for-racy-myspace-pictures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">mfloriani</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>